Author name: Don Perignon

Uncategorized

California Bill to End the Epidemic of Trans-Identifying Male Rapists in Female Prisons Shot Down by Democrats

On April 29, 2025, the California legislature shot down a bill prohibiting trans-identifying men with a history of sexual violence from being housed in women’s correctional facilities. 

The Golden State allows prisoners to be incarcerated in correctional facilities matching their preferred gender identity after passing the Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act, or SB132, in 2021. Other states with similar laws are Maine, New York, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Washington.  

However, safety concerns for biological women have persisted, prompting state Sen. Shannon Grove to introduce SB311. If it passed, the law would’ve required the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to provide a secure facility to house transgender-identifying men in women’s prisons to protect the security needs of biological women.

Additionally, it would’ve ban biological men who identify as women and are registered sex offenders from being housed in women’s facilities.

“Any inmate convicted of an offense for which they are required to register pursuant to Section 290, except for biological women at birth, shall be ineligible for housing at a women’s prison.”

Currently, California law requires the CDCR to consider each transgender inmate’s request for transfer to a female facility. Such transfer requests do not consider the inmate’s sexual violence history, whether they have intact male genitalia, or have undergone gender transition procedures. 

About 898 transgender-identifying men have requested to be transferred to women’s facilities, of which 45 have been effected, while 208 are still pending.

Meanwhile, the CDCR is aware of potential intimate relations between transgender-identifying male prisoners and their biological counterparts and distributes condoms in prison.

Similarly, it is aware that biological female inmates are afraid of potential sexual violence from transgender-identifying male counterparts. Physical violence and other forms of degrading and demeaning attacks on biological female inmates by transgender inmates have been widely reported.

Over one quarter of inmates have experienced such incidents, including sexual assaults by biological male inmates who identify as women, while two-thirds are afraid for their safety. 

Several high-profile cases of sexual assault by trans-identifying individuals have been reported in California and other states. 

In 2024, Tremaine Carroll, a six-foot-tall biological man who identifies as a woman was accused of raping two inmates one of whom became pregnant and also attempting to intimidate a witness to stop them from testifying. Carroll had been transferred to the Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) in Chowchilla in 2021 when SB132 became law. 

Ironically, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) used him as proof that trans-identifying men were not a threat to the safety of biological female inmates. While the case is still ongoing, he was eventually transferred to the Salinas Valley State Prison male facility under California’s Three Strikes Law.

Female inmate Krystal Gonzalez, who was sexually trafficked at 13, was also allegedly repeatedly raped by a transgender detainee and reportedly faced a disciplinary action when she reported the incident. 

Seemingly, SB311 could fail to pass as California Democrats prioritize the convenience of transgender individuals over the safety of biological women. 

Trans

Military Goes Woke Again: Pentagon Resumes Taxpayer-Funded Transgender Care for Servicemembers

The Pentagon will resume sex change treatments for transgender servicemembers or their trans-identifying dependents. Services to resume include gender dysphoria diagnosis, hormone therapy, surgical procedures, and mental health care and counseling. 

In a new memo dated April 21 seen by Politico, the Pentagon’s acting assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, Dr. Stephen Ferrara, announced the return of the radical policy.

“Service members and all other covered beneficiaries 19 years of age or older may receive appropriate care for their diagnosis of [gender dysphoria], including mental health care and counseling and newly initiated or ongoing cross-sex hormone therapy,” it reads.

So-called “Gender affirming” procedures and care halted after Trump signed the “Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness” Executive Order 14183. It required the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to update the Medical Standards for Military Service  within sixty days. 

Among other things, it required the Secretary of Defense to “promptly issue directives for DoD to end invented and identification-based pronoun usage” in the military.

It also declared “medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria” as “inconsistent” with the “high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

On February 7, 2025, Hegseth issued a memo directing the Pentagon to halt the recruitment of servicemembers suffering from gender dysphoria and pause gender affirming care in line with Trump’s executive orders.

“Effective immediately, all new accessions for individuals with a history of gender dysphoria are paused, and all unscheduled, scheduled, or planned medical procedures associated with affirming or facilitating a gender transition for Service members are paused,” the memo stated.

However, on March 18, 2025, the first openly gay, Uruguayan-born U.S. district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Ana Reyes, blocked Hegseth’s decision, terming it unconstitutional. The Biden appointee also issued an order for the Pentagon to “take all steps necessary to effectuate” her order, including restoring gender-affirming care for transgender servicemembers.

Similarly, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle also issued a nationwide injunction lifting the ban on transgender service members joining the military and restored gender-affirming care, essentially reinstating the Biden-era policy across the military. 

Settle argued that Trump’s executive order likely violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment right to equal protection under the law. He also ruled that the Trump administration failed to prove that gender dysphoria affects cohesion within the military.

“The government falls well short of its burden to show that banning transgender service is substantially related to achieving unit cohesion, good order, or discipline,” Judge Settle wrote.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has appealed the rulings and asked the Supreme Court to enforce its transgender policy. Trump argues that the nationwide injunction oversteps the issuing court’s judicial authority. 

Subsequently, the resumption of gender-affirming care for transgender servicemembers will likely be temporary, as the Supreme Court could uphold Trump’s ban given its long-established deference to the military.

“Nevertheless, so long as the Court follows its long history of showing extreme deference to the military, it seems exceedingly likely that the Trump administration will prevail in this case,” wrote Vox’s senior legal correspondent Ian Millhiser.

Big Government, Border, Uncategorized

Border Czar Tom Homan Will “Seek Prosecution” after NJ Gov. Murphy Admitted Harboring an Illegal Alien

Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan has reacted swiftly to New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy (D) admitting that he and NJ’s first lady Tammy were harboring an illegal alien. In a rather “foolish” show of defiance, the governor of the Garden State also suggested that the undocumented individual was beyond the reach of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. Gov. Murphy made the damning confession while talking to a Leftwing organization Blue Wave New Jersey.

“Tammy and I were talking about – I don’t want to get into too much detail – but there is someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they are trying to get it to,” Murphy confessed.

“And we said, ‘You know what? Let’s have her live at our house above our garage’ and good luck to the feds coming in to try to get her.”

Homan had warned Americans, including politicians like the Chicago Mayor, against harboring illegal aliens, which is a federal crime under Title 8 of the United States Code 1324 III. He also told the “not very smart” Boston Mayor Michelle Wu to “get the hell out of the way” after she vowed not to cooperate with Trump’s deportations.

However, Gov. Murphy has upped the stakes by being the most-ranking politician to confess to harboring an illegal alien despite Homan’s repeated warnings.

“I think the governor is pretty foolish,” Homan said. 

“I got note of it. Won’t let it go. We’ll look into it,” he continued.

“And if he’s knowingly harboring and concealing an illegal alien, that’s a violation of Title VIII of the United States Code 1324.”

“I would seek prosecution, or the secretary will seek prosecution,” Homan warned. “Maybe he’s bluffing. If not, we’ll deal with that.”

Homan also disclosed that the Trump administration would sue sanctuary cities for harboring illegal aliens, who he said are responsible for killing thousands of children. 

Homan also noted that the illegal immigrant killer of Laken Riley was comfortably living in the New York City sanctuary beyond the reach of the feds despite facing child endangerment charges. José Antonio Ibarra also had an active arrest warrant after skipping court hearings related to an alleged Walmart theft in Athens, Georgia.

Gov. Murphy should learn from Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, who quickly retracted his statement that he was willing to go to jail for fighting Trump’s deportations. 

“Me and the Denver mayor agree on one thing,” Homan said. “He’s willing to go to jail. I’m willing to put him in jail.”

If Gov. Murphy is bluffing, he might earn street cred for being the tough guy who challenged Homan without risking his freedom, which is likely what he is doing. However, the thought of incarcerating a senior Democrat over illegal immigration would be very satisfying to most Americans who love their country.

Meanwhile, Gov. Murphy’s confession came at a critical moment when Homan said he would step up deportations and target other categories of illegal aliens besides national security threats. Appearing on ABC News, he warned that anybody in the country illegally was not exempt from deportation. 

“If you’re in the country illegally, you’re on the table.”

Race, Uncategorized, Woke

FAA Sued for Turning Down Qualified Air Traffic Controllers for Being “Too White”

Hot on the heels of the recent D.C plane crash, a lawsuit alleging that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) turned down qualified air traffic controllers because they were “too white” has resurfaced. 

Nearly 1,000  air traffic control applicants were allegedly affected by the diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) hiring practice. The lawsuit, which traces its origins to the Obama administration, resurfaced after the deadly crash that has so far killed over five dozen people.

Andrew Brigida, represented by the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), is among over 900 applicants who scored 100% on the air traffic controller test but were allegedly turned down because they did not check all the diversity checkboxes.

The plaintiff had graduated from Arizona State University in partnership with the FAA via a program used to select the most qualified controllers. After acing the test, he was subsequently placed on a preferred candidate list before being turned down after the FAA changed the hiring rules. 

According to the lawsuit, the FAA changed the hiring process to include a biographical assessment questionnaire, turning down hundreds of qualified applicants before they even showed up. William Perry Pendley, MSFL’s president handling the case, his client received an email stating that the FAA was “implementing changes to improve and streamline” the hiring process and that his application had been impacted.

The assessment not only discriminated on race but also awarded extra points to applicants who performed poorly in maths.

“Nevermind how insulting it was that the government was concluding that this is a way to pool up African Americans into the air traffic control ranks, but that’s all there,” said former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt. “They did change the test to change the applicant pool.”

In 2018, the FAA dropped the biographical assessment tool after Congress voted against it, requiring applicants to pass the Air Traffic Skills Assessment (ATSA) to demonstrate competence. 

Regarding the D.C. plane tragedy, MSFL’s president told the British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, that “DEI hiring policies have no place in America, especially in safety-critical industries, yet they have shaped the FAA’s hiring decisions for years.

“Last night’s accident is a sobering reminder of the cost of placing ideology over expertise. How many more tragedies must occur before we return to common sense? It’s time to demand accountability, end DEI hiring in aviation, and restore safety as the top priority in our airways.”

However, the FAA contests the lawsuit. It says there was a skill shortage for air traffic controllers and that it was doing its best to ensure no talent was left out.

“There is a well-known national shortage of air traffic controllers, and the FAA has ramped up outreach to ensure no talent is left on the table.”

However, turning down 900 applicants who aced the test does not particularly suggest a talent shortage. Perhaps, there is a talent shortage for individuals who meet a certain demographic criteria.

Vowing to “restore faith in American air travel,” President Trump blamed Biden for lowering standards to the lowest level, resulting in people with “severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities” being hired to achieve DEI objectives.

“I put safety first,” Trump said, adding that “Obama, Biden, and the Democrats put policy first, and they put politics at a level that nobody’s ever seen, because this was the lowest level, their policy was horrible, and their politics was even worse.”

According to its website, the agency specifically targeted people with “targeted disabilities” during its hiring process.

“Targeted disabilities are those disabilities that the federal government, as a matter of policy, has identified for special emphasis in recruitment and hiring,” the website reads.

Further worsening the hiring crisis before the accident, the New York Times reported that staffing was not “normal for the time of day and volume of traffic.” One air traffic controller had left their post at the time of the accident, leaving one employee to handle both the passenger airplane and the helicopter, a job that would ordinarily require two people.

Trump has ordered a “systematic and comprehensive investigation” to establish the cause of the accident.

Left-wing extremism

Teacher Who Cannot Be Bothered To Work Warns Against “Correcting” People of Color

The effective confirmation of Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee means we all must endure at least three months of left-wing extremists telling us how to live our lives, and how to cast our vote – all while being cringe-inducing while doing so.

One group to watch are the “white women for Kamala Harris” who, as the name suggests, are white liberal women in favor of the Democrat who also happen to suffer from white guilt.

At the end of July, the group held a Zoom call where they all instructed others on how to prepare for the upcoming political battle for the White House.

After warning about toxicity, teacher turned self-proclaimed influencer, Arielle Fodor, proved old habits die hard and offered a lecture on how white women can assist “marginalized communities,” whatever those are.

“The toxic [sic] feels smaller when we support each other,” she told others on the Zoom call. “But don’t make it about yourself; as white women we need to use our privilege to make positive changes.”

“If you find yourself talking over or speaking for BIPOC [Black, Indigenous, and people of color] individuals or, God forbid, correcting them, just take a beat,” she added. “Instead, we can put our listening ears on.”

So, there we have it; political correctness has come full circle – where it’s now considered politically incorrect to correct someone if they’re incorrect.

Fortunately, many women on social media distanced themselves from the group.

Others found the instructional language demeaning.

Sports

Male Boxer Who Failed Gender Eligibility Test Allowed To Fight Women In Olympic Games

Two boxers who previously failed a gender eligibility test are set to take part in the women’s division at the Olympic Games in Paris.

Imane Khelif of Algeria and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan were both disqualified from the 2023 World Championships in New Delhi, India, after tests revealed they both had XY chromosomes, and thus were not women.

The competition had been organized by the International Boxing Association (IBA), which formerly ran Olympic competitions as well. This changed prior to the games amid questions over governance at the IBA.

As a result, boxing will now be overseen by the International Olympic Committee’s Paris Boxing Unit (PBU) where eligibility requirements are more relaxed. Because of this, Khelif and Lin are permitted to take part in the female category despite previously failing a gender eligibility test.

“The PBU used the Tokyo 2020 ­boxing rules (enforced at the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020 and the related quali­fying tournaments) as a baseline to develop its regulations. Those rules descended from the Rio 2016 rules,” the IOC said in a statement. “The PBU endeavored to restrict amendments to minimize the impact on athletes’ preparation and guaranteeing consistency between Olympic Games.”

Footage of Khelif’s ability (seen below) has raised concerns among many, with Riley Gaines saying that it “glorifies men punching women in the face with the intent of knocking them unconscious.”

“A woman is going to die,” she added.

Many on social media called other athletes to boycott the competition.

Others raised concerns over promoting man-on-woman abuse.

There were also calls for men to call out the decision.


Scroll to Top